HISTORICAL JOURNEYS: Craters of the Moon and Other Traces of the Great War

In this photo essay, Maddie Lazarski, a recent History graduate, reflects on how the experience of visiting sites associated with the Great War in January 2015 helped her grasp its lasting effects.  The tour guide in Verdun, as the essay notes, compared the land around the battle sites to the surface of the moon.

SAMSUNG CAMERA PICTURES

Landscape near Verdun.

After visiting various sites in Verdun and the Somme region in France, and Ypres, Belgium, I felt that a photo journal was the best way to display my feelings about what I learned and how it affected me.  Reading and learning about something is completely different than actually being there to physically witness it.  This is the primary lesson that I learned on our study tours.  After reading and learning about World War I for years, I knew that it was destructive for Europe, but I had underestimated just how much.  Four years of brutal warfare caused damage that cannot be adequately described by words alone.  Being in the places where these horrible battles took place was an experience that I will never be able to replicate.  I was finally able to see what these soldiers and civilians had witnessed and to understand why WWI is known as the Great War.  One hundred years later, and its effects are still very obvious throughout France and Belgium.

lazarski4

The shells that were used in WWI caused extreme damage to the landscape.  When we visited Verdun, our guide prefaced the tour by talking about how some areas almost look like the moon.  When I got out of the bus, I knew exactly what he was talking about.  It was a completely different experience than just reading about the damage to the landscape.

lazarski5

This is a real trench that was used during the Great War.  Being able to stand in the trench helped me to put myself in the place of the soldiers as they were travelling from one location to the next.  The dreary, rainy weather also helped me to better understand what they went through.

lazarski6

The bones of 130,000 unknown soldiers are laid to rest at this Ossuary.  It was incredible to actually see the sheer volume of the men who could never be buried by their families.

lazarski7

Fleury is one of nine towns in and around the area where the Battle of Verdun took place that was completely destroyed and abandoned.  The only thing in the town was rebuilt was the chapel that is pictured.  There are markers around the church that label where roads, homes, and farms used to be.  It was really incredible to see how much the war affected civilians as well as soldiers.

lazarski8

Though the United States suffered far fewer casualties than the rest of Europe, there were still many young lives that were lost.  Along with the monument to American soldiers, the cemetery helped me to understand the importance of American troops in the war.  Our tour guide talked about how in some ways they saved the French.

lazarski9

The Reims Cathedral was destroyed by the Germans in WWI and it was rebuilt shortly after the war ended.  It is where French kings were crowned and was full of culture and history.  It was shocking to me that they would destroy such an important location and really attested to the brutality of the Great War.

lazarski10

At each cemetery for soldiers that fought with the United Kingdom, there is the common theme of the cross of sacrifice and the stone of remembrance.  On the stone are the words, “Their name liveth for evermore.”  I felt that it was a beautiful way to remember the soldiers who gave their lives in the war.

lazarski11

This is one of many graves of unknown soldiers that fought in the Great War, this one located in the Somme region of France.  The amount of headstones that said only “A soldier of the Great War, Known unto God” was impressive.  Sometimes it was possible to identify the rank or nationality of a soldier, but this was not always the case.

lazarski12

The Thiepval Memorial Gate lists the names of 72,000 Anglo-French soldiers that died in the Somme region and were never recovered.  The arch was massive and completely covered with names.  I was shocked to see how many people in that region alone were not recovered.

lazarski13lazarski14

When burying the known soldiers, the family had the option of paying to add a small inscription.  These were some of the most impactful aspects of the trip for me.  It was heartbreaking and beautiful to see the ways that families chose to remember their sons, brothers, and husbands.  The inscription on the left reads: “Tread softy, our dear hero boy sleeps here” from the soldier’s father, mother, and brothers.  The inscription on the right says: “Another life lost, hearts broken for what.”  It made me think about the meaning of the war and whether it was worth it to lose so many lives.  In the end, I believe that they fought for a noble cause, but it is hard for me to rationalize the loss of so many young men.  Seeing the amount of graves and the moving transcriptions was an experience unlike any other.  It made me feel closer to the soldiers and witnesses than anything else that I saw on these tours.

lazarski15

This is a shelter made from concrete, located near Flanders Fields.  It was crooked, dark, depressing, and small.  But it was the best protection from shells that soldiers could get.  These areas were reserved for medical care, high-ranking officers, kitchens, and bathrooms.  When I walked into the shelter, I was shocked at how low the ceilings were and how depressing the atmosphere was.  I could only imagine what it was like with shells raining down outside in the middle of a battle with wounded, dying soldiers being carried in to be cared for.

lazarski16

The German cemetery at Langemarck in Belgium had a drastically different atmosphere than the other cemeteries we visited.  The gravestones were flat on the ground and did not have inscriptions.  The coloring of the whole cemetery was dark and depressing as opposed to the light, beautiful places of remembrance that were created for the French, Americans, British, and others.  I really felt the anger and sadness of the French at this cemetery.  These were the people who attacked them and brutalized their land, but they still honored them in death.

lazarski17

Similarly to the Reims Cathedral, the Cloth Hall in Ypres, Belgium is an ancient building (constructed in the 1200s) that was destroyed by the Germans and later rebuilt.  It furthered my understanding of the destruction that took place during the war.  Nothing was off limits.  Though the building is still beautiful and historic, it is not the same as it was before.

lazarski18

The Menin Gate in Ypres is very similar to the Thiepval memorial, covered with names of soldiers whose bodies were never recovered (54,000).  What really struck me was the fact that every night at 8 pm, a ceremony, “Last Post,” is held to honor the victims.  Though it began 100 years ago, the war is still so real in Europe.  This is something that we are unable to experience in the United States, as we have never had such a destructive war at home.

HISTORICAL JOURNEYS: In the Fields of the Somme

In January 2015, Riley Kane took part in a Miami Winter Term Workshop on “The Great War at 100.”  In this essay, republished for this issue and timed to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the Battle of the Somme, he reflects on one grave in the Somme region and its larger meanings.

SAMSUNG CAMERA PICTURES

Graves of Australian soldiers at the Australian National Memorial Cemetery.

By Riley Kane

 

At the Australian National Memorial in Albert I was moved to shed a few tears at a tombstone inscribed with the Bible verse “Greater love hath no man than he giveth his life for a friend.”  I was further moved by the thought that a quotation on a tombstone for an Australian soldier with which I have no familial or national connection.  Before that moment I was more concerned about how the war happened and how the Second World War resulted from it. I took it for granted that the war happened and never looked for meaning in it, I saw it as another episode in history with various causes and effects. But standing there in that cemetery, so moved, I thought this man and all those who perished in the war could not have died for nothing. He did not die just to prepare the world for World War Two, there had to be something the Great War alone achieved. There are those today who try to forget the war or remember it as a pointless blood-letting, the pinnacle of militaristic folly and I had let them creep into my thinking about the war. They are wrong, the Great War achieved something, it taught society a lesson: that war is horrible and men should not be sent to die lightly.

The poet laureate Rudyard Kipling serves as perhaps the greatest embodiment of this lesson. Before the First World War he romanticized warfare, in his poem If and The White Man’s Burden, but also in other works, he perpetuated the romantic vision of war during the nineteenth century. In the when the Great War broke out he pressured his son to fight, which resulted in his son’s was death in 1915. Kipling makes a great transformation after this. His poems completely change form, once long, optimistic, and confident they became short, pessimistic, and defeated. One should note that If contains 288 words, The White Man’s Burden 165. I quote the entirety of The Common Form to show Kipling’s change of spirit, “If any question why we died / Tell them, because our fathers lied.” Kipling and others lied to their children when they extolled the virtue of war, he realized with many others during the war that battles are not beautiful, they are horrible. You can feel the pain with which Kipling wrote those lines. It took a horrible loss to show Kipling the error of his ways, and a similar lesson would be repeated all across Europe and the world.

To see the Western Front today and then consider how all of it would have been destroyed over the course of the war is shocking, almost impossible. One can only try to imagine how horrible it must have felt for people to see their homeland ruined before their eyes. No war before or since has wreaked such horrific physical destruction on the landscape. It is challenging knowing what I know to envision the towns we traveled through reduced to craters and mud, or to conceive of being able to sit on a horse and look through all Ypres. Huge numbers of people participated in the war and thus saw its horrors. It is likely that in numerous nations every person was affected by the death of a loved one and therefore suffered from serious grief. (Audoin-Rouzeau and Becker 214-215) People watched their nations go to war excitedly or at least with a blithe ignorance, and saw their homes destroyed and their loved ones slaughtered.

Such serious physical and mental damage would leave a lasting impact, the First World War caused a distinct rupture with the past and made the world see warfare overall as a tragedy, something to be avoided and entered not for glory, rather for necessity. Being at the western front and visiting the staggering number of tombs and monuments made me see that the war truly was a massive tragedy. An off-hand quote by Dr. Norris during the trip captured the sentiment quite well, while in France he said: “Now you see why the French surrendered so quickly in World War Two.” The French would do anything to avoid the destruction of the First World War. It makes Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler now seems less cowardly and more reasonable, given the feelings of his constituents. After the war there was a broad desire for peace in the world, this inspired the League of Nations, which would lead to the UN and made it so that poets would no longer speak of war in romantic, glorious terms.

The men who gave their lives did not die for nothing. Through their sacrifice the world abandoned the romantic notions that prevailed throughout all previous history and began to abhor war. Versailles would not be enough, the second act of the Great War, World War Two, would need to end for projects of peace and unity to begin in earnest, but while it was after the Second World War that these things happened they were inspired by a peace movement that was born of the First World War. We have achieved a more peaceful world today than any before. Much work still remains, but without the tragic sacrifices of the Great War there would be no United Nations, no European Union, possibly still colonies and empires. The Great War precipitated a massive shift in the way that people saw the world. For the Great War to have caused this change it does not really matter why the war started, or what people fought for, because the collective tragedy of WWI in the long term changed how people thought about militaries and international political systems and made them yearn for peace, because they finally understood how horrible war could be.

SAMSUNG CAMERA PICTURES

Bibliography

Audoin-Rouzeau, Stéphane and Annette Becker. 14-18 Understanding the Great War. New York: Hill and Wang, 2002.

Riley Kane is a senior history major and president of the Miami University History Association.

PAST AND PRESENT: Divided We Stand: How the US Can Learn From Political Polarization in Latin American History

By Joey DeMarco

On the morning of Tuesday, November 8th, I awoke to find that a friend had posted the following about one of the candidates for President of the United States on Facebook: “If you are voting for this monster, please unfriend me; you are beyond any human bounds of decency.” This post is emblematic of the deep political divisions in the United States today. Harsh and divisive rhetoric from political leaders, combined with the social media-driven ability to create a sort of ideological echo chamber, means that the public finds itself more polarized than ever. Through the ever-expanding reaches of social media, the way that these political tensions manifest themselves in various aspects of U.S. culture is automatically documented for future generations to remember. With this in mind, one cannot help but reflect on how this moment will be remembered compared to similar periods in world history. Specifically, the U.S. can draw from lessons learned by examining textbooks in Latin American countries such as Argentina and Venezuela from particularly contentious moments in their history. How these textbooks reflected a divided society, combined with the historical context of events that unfolded in these countries as a result, can tell us a great deal about the legacies of countries where governments and citizens embrace political polarization.

In 1946, Juan Perón was elected President of Argentina on the back of a campaign to empower Argentine workers. As part of his movement, Perón openly pushed resentment of the country’s elites and repressed dissenting opinions, fostering deep divisions within the country. He became well known for the slogan “Alpargatos sí, libros no” (shoes yes, books no), simultaneously a call for social programs to help the country’s poor and a condemnation of universities, which he saw as a place to foster dissent from elites. In attempting to limit opposition, he reconstructed the education system as a place to standardize what it meant to be Argentine and build support for his own government. Schools nationwide were required to read Perón’s wife Eva’s autobiography. Textbooks specifically described Juan and Eva Perón as patriotic figures ready to defend the country by any means necessary, and mentioned that wealth redistribution was a moral responsibility of the rich[1]. Though the goal was a country unified in support of Perón, this attempt to create a standardized national ideology only further isolated Perón’s opponents and carved deep national divisions. Perón was overthrown by a military coup in 1955, and though his rhetoric was not the sole cause, the tensions it brought to the country certainly did not buy him any favors. This case illustrates the dangers of attempting to wash over differing opinions. Peron’s actions to use textbooks to try and define the opinions of schoolchildren combined with his rhetoric that harbored animosity between political groups created a society that could not function together, culminating in his forced removal from office. U.S. society could learn from the dangers of ignoring political opposition. It is all too easy today to receive news from slanted sources online and surround oneself with like-minded individuals. This allows groups to ramp up disdain for and fear of differing opinions without trying to understand their rational, rendering civil interactions increasingly rare.

Image1

In more recent history, since the 1998 election of Hugo Chávez, the Venezuelan government has sought to define its political interactions with opponents as a battle between good and bad. The rhetoric of Chávez and his successor, Nicolás Maduro (who define their governmental movement as the “Bolivarian Revolution”), has been extremely harsh, defining opponents as enemies of the state and their government as the country’s natural protector. The Executive Branch has generally refused to work with the opposition controlled Legislature, and has been widely criticized for the jailing of political opponents (a suggestion which would be familiar to followers of the U.S. election, both Republican and Democrat). These actions have created a deeply divided country which sees almost daily protests for and against the government, oftentimes resulting in clashes that leave protestors wounded.  The type of government rhetoric that has led to these moments can be seen, as in Argentina, from an evaluation of the Venezuelan public school classroom, which has been constitutionally required to promote “Bolivarian ideals” since 1999.  This has meant the teaching of socialism and hyper-nationalism as inherent values for schoolchildren to have. A manifestation of this strategy can be seen in this corresponding image, which comes from an illustrated children’s edition of Venezuela’s constitution distributed to all schoolchildren. The drawing shows a man with the words “Venezuelan State” printed on a trademark red Chavista shirt, shielding a myriad of obliviously joyful children from some rather devious-looking individuals. The image is meant to conjure sentiments of the government as a paternal, protective figure, while the unidentified nature of the threatening characters means that children cannot be sure of who to trust other than the state. The effects of the presentation of this type of material in Venezuelan public schools are very real. A 2013 survey suggested heavy divides in the way schoolchildren view the country.  This survey shows how fourth through sixth grade children in public, or “Bolivarian,” and private schools responded to a series of questions regarding their perceptions of the nation.  The results indicate that the ideological influence of pro-Bolivarian materials in public schools, and presumably anti-Bolivarian material in private ones, begins to push young Venezuelan citizens into certain world perspectives. The divides in Venezuelan society are already present at young ages, showing the effects that exposure to a uniform attitude or narrative can have. As today’s Venezuela suffers perhaps more political turmoil than any other country in the hemisphere, the U.S. could stand to learn from the lessons of its ideological education program. Framing differences of opinion as a battle between good and bad or isolated exposure to one viewpoint creates a dangerous situation whereby resentment between groups boils over into real, tangible outcomes.

By almost any metric, the U.S. is more politically divided today than it has been in living memory. Per the Pew Research Center,[3] the public defines itself as more ideologically extreme and less politically moderate than it did even 20 years ago. A report by The Economist notes that public opinion matches the trends of political leaders, as Republicans and Democrats in Congress vote with the majority of members of their own party with increasing exclusivity.[4] The Facebook post I opened with is representative of the feelings of many Americans that those who do not share the same political opinions as them are not just ideologically, but factually and morally wrong. The social media-driven echo chamber that it is so tempting to enter diminishes critical thinking in favor of reaffirmation of existing ideas. It is easier to confirm your opinions than to meticulously analyze them, and it is easier to do that today than ever. The U.S. public must fight this urge, or fail to learn from the lessons of the past. Isolating oneself with one unchallenged ideology, painting those with different opinions as the enemy, and trying to force others to conform to certain political opinions led to measurable turmoil in Argentina and Venezuela. All of these have been very visible responses to recent events such as the November presidential election. These reactions have been documented and immortalized online, and will surely be a major part of what this time period is remembered for. As individuals, members of the U.S. public must now be open to, and indeed seek out, regular interaction and dialogue amongst those with diverse opinions. These actions are pivotal as we look to heal the wounds of a divided nation and not have this present moment become a case study in the dangers of embracing political division.

 

[1] Plotkin, Mariano Ben. Mañana es San Perón: A Cultural History of Perón’s Argentina. Wilmington, Del.: SR Books, 2003: 110.

[2] Anselmi, Manuel. Chavez’s Children : Ideology, Education, and Society in Latin America. Lanham : Lexington Books, 2013: 136-137.

[3] http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/07/americas-political-divisions-in-5-charts/

[4] http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21591190-united-states-amoeba

Joey DeMarco is a Senior majoring in International Studies and Latin American Studies.  He wrote this essay in conjunction with his project for Dr. Elena Jackson Albarran’s Fall 2016 HST/LAS capstone on children in Latin America.

HISTORICAL JOURNEYS: Prague, Past and Present

Prague has become a tourist mecca since 1989:  its beautiful cityscape conveys its rich history, as Sarah Childs explains in this photo essay.

By Sarah Childs

Prague, the capital of the Czech Republic, has a unique history, which is presented by the city today. It was a part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire but became Czechoslovakia after World War I. Slovakia briefly split from it during World War II but in 1948, after it was reunited, the Soviets invaded and Czechoslovakia became a Soviet satellite state. The Czechs attempted to lessen the control of communism in 1968 during the “Prague Spring,” but Warsaw Pact troops, mostly from Russia, invaded and put down this act of defiance. However, in 1989 the Velvet Revolution occurred that peacefully broke Czechoslovakia away from the rest of the USSR. Then in 1993 the country peacefully split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

The Czech Republic’s history can be seen throughout the city and surrounding areas. However, its Soviet history plays a large role in Prague based on the remnants from the area. Some buildings are architecturally different from many of the hundreds of years old buildings and these buildings stand out compared to the rest. The current government, in part housed in historical buildings, shows how the modern Czech Republic incorporates its pre-Soviet history into its modern government. This gives the impression that the country is still actively moving away from Soviet influence. Soviet history is a part of the Czech Republic and its capital of Prague shows this and how it is incorporated into the city, adding to its unique history.

IMG_2872

This was taken on the way to Prague Castle. This landscape view of Prague does not show nearly the entire city, but shows how large it is and its architectural diversity.

IMG_2832

This was taken from the Charles Bridge and shows the Prague Castle. The castle began construction build during King Charles’s IV rule. The Charles Bridge is named after him.  Today, the Czech president resides in the castle and surrounding area.

Prague

This is the outside of the Czech Senate. The Senate is housed in this historical building surrounded by a large garden area which this picture only shows a small fraction of. The location of the Czech government shows a focus on its pre-Soviet history.

IMG_3363

One of the most prevalent Soviet era buildings is the Žižkov Television Tower. It was built between 1985 and 1992, showing that even though the USSR had fallen by the time it was finished and Czechoslovakia broke from the USSR even sooner, the building was still completed. This shows how Soviet influence was prevalent immediately following its collapse and that the country did not try to completely alter its culture to erase Soviet influence.  The babies crawling up the side are an art installation by the Czech artist, David Černý.

IMG_3398

View from the top of the Žižkov Tower, showing Prague’s diverse cityscape.

IMG_3521

View from near the Prague Castle but with fewer tourists, for Prague has many during the summer. The modern buildings in the background show how the city has modernized to more Western standards following its break from the USSR.

IMG_2995

Clearing along a path behind the Prague Castle which used to be a part of the moat. This area is now a park, but during Soviet times it was closed to the public. Its opening to the public today represents that the people enjoy more freedoms to travel within the city, country, and outside of the country, compared to Soviet times.

IMG_2124

This anti-Russia protest in Old Town Square shows the prevalence of anti-Russian sentiments that continue to exist in the Czech Republic.

Prague2

View from the Vltava River. Many historical buildings have been preserved, showing their detailed architecture. Soviet architecture was not this intricate.

IMG_3565

Representing Miami University in Prague! The city is extremely diverse and each part of it shows its unique history. Soviet influence still affects the country, but the city shows that even though Soviet history is recent, Prague represents hundreds of years of history that all influences the country today.

Sarah Childs is a Junior History Major.  She studied in Prague in the summer of 2016 through USAC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take a Journey into the Past!

UniversalisCosmographia

Launched in Fall 2016, Journeys into the Past is an online journal associated with Miami University’s History Department.  It will feature issues dedicated to student research, student writing, innovative classes and classroom activities, and departmental events.  Stay tuned:  the first issue will be published soon!